Application: | Power, Electronic, Rectifier |
---|---|
Phase: | Three |
Core: | Core-type Transformer |
Shipping Cost:
Estimated freight per unit. |
about shipping cost and estimated delivery time. |
---|
Payment Method: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Initial Payment Full Payment |
Currency: | US$ |
---|
Return&refunds: | You can apply for a refund up to 30 days after receipt of the products. |
---|
Suppliers with verified business licenses
1. Dupont Nomex aramid insulation material is used for high-temperature resistance, high mechanical strength, high electrical insulation, and high stability.
2. It has vibration model simulation analysis and effective noise reduction.
3. lt has a unique semi-encapsulated structure, strong dust resistance high insulation performance, and strong overload capacity.
4. The low-voltage coil is of foil-wound structure, NOMEX material is selected as the insulation between interlayers and the end, the lead copper bar and copper are welded by ammonia arc through special equipment, and the coil is baked and cured by VPl vacuum pressure impregnation at high temperature which significantly reduces the noise of the transformer during operation.
5. The high voltage coil is a segmented cylinder layer coil, air duct heat dissipation, with end sealing, and NOMEX paper winding on the surface; Dustproof, moisture-proof, and salt spray prevention.
6. The active parts adopt a coil as the load-bearing body, with a core mounting structure. The lapping part on the core adopts a special glue end sealing process to ensure the minimum force and lightweight on the core.
7. Flame retardant, explosion-proof, non-pollution, high fire rating excellent characteristics are more suitable for charging stations, data centers, hospitals, smart zones, and other areas.
Comparison of no-load loss of 10kV dry type distribution transformer under different energy consumption levers of GB20052-2020 standard |
|||||||||
Rated Capacity (kVA) |
No-load loss (Class 1) |
No-load loss (Class 2) |
No-load loss (Class 3) |
||||||
Silicon steel sheet (W) SCB18 |
Amorphous alloy (W) SCRBH19 or SCBH19 |
No-load loss reduction(%) |
Silicon steel sheet (W) SCB14 |
Amorphous alloy (W) SCRBH17 or SCBH17 |
No-load loss reduction(%) |
Silicon steel sheet (W) SCB12 |
Amorphous alloy (W) SCRBH15 or SCBH15 |
No-load loss reduction(%) |
|
200 |
360 |
140 |
61.10% |
420 |
170 |
59.5% |
495 |
200 |
59.6% |
250 |
415 |
160 |
61.40% |
490 |
195 |
60.2% |
575 |
230 |
60.0% |
315 |
510 |
195 |
61.80% |
600 |
235 |
60.8% |
705 |
280 |
60.3% |
400 |
570 |
215 |
62.30% |
665 |
265 |
60.2% |
785 |
310 |
60.5% |
500 |
670 |
250 |
62.70% |
790 |
305 |
61.4% |
930 |
360 |
61.3% |
630 |
750 |
290 |
61.30% |
885 |
350 |
60.5% |
1040 |
410 |
60.6% |
800 |
875 |
335 |
61.70% |
1035 |
410 |
60.4% |
1215 |
480 |
60.5% |
1000 |
1020 |
385 |
62.30% |
1205 |
470 |
61.0% |
1415 |
550 |
61.1% |
1250 |
1205 |
455 |
62.20% |
1420 |
550 |
61.3% |
1670 |
650 |
61.1% |
1600 |
1415 |
530 |
62.50% |
1665 |
645 |
61.3% |
1960 |
760 |
61.2% |
2000 |
1760 |
700 |
60.20% |
2075 |
850 |
59.0% |
2440 |
1000 |
59.0% |
2500 |
2080 |
840 |
59.60% |
2450 |
1020 |
58.4% |
2880 |
1200 |
58.3% |
As shown in the above table -No-load loss data of each energy efficiency class, we can see ever the Class-Three energy efficiency transformer in amorphous alloy, its no-load loss is far lower than that of the Class-One energy efficiency transformer in silicon steel.
Therefore, supposing there are requirements for "Green construction," a lower load rate, and long time no-load operation, in this case, the Class-Two & Three energy efficiency transformers in the amorphous alloy should be considered in priority. In the era of "carbon peak" and "carbon neutrality", amorphous alloy transformers will become the main force of energy-saving transformers. Whether it is a silicon steel transformer or an amorphous alloy transformer, the Class-One energy efficiency is better than the Class-Two, and much better than Class -Three, however, the cost of equipment will be higher than lower one, the higher energy efficiency class will be the higher cost, so it needs to consider the quality/cost in total.
NOTE: The load loss of the amorphous alloy and silicon steel sheet is the same, and the electricity charge is calculated at 1.0 RMB/KWH at any load rate, the amorphous alloy transformer changes relative to the silicon steel with the same capacity and energy efficiency grade pressure, have greater energy saving advantages. Taking a semi-enclosed SCRBH19-2500kVA amorphous alloy dry transformer as an example, compared with the SCB18 dry type transformer, it will save 10,862KWH of electricity every year, and the electricity bill is calculated by 1 RMB/KWH, and the annual cost will be saved by about 11,000 RMB; ln the amorphous dry type transformer at least 30 years of service life, it will save more than 300,000 RMB of electricity.
Suppliers with verified business licenses